From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.13.140.93] (helo=dd20204.kasserver.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L3Zty-0007vm-61 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:34:42 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.103] (unknown [77.21.130.13]) by dd20204.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AB7180445F2 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:32:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4926F095.8030007@opensimpad.org> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:32:05 +0100 From: Bernhard Guillon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <48E6624C.7000409@opensimpad.org> <48E758CB.7040209@opensimpad.org> <48EB45F0.8080809@opensimpad.org> <48EB5730.8030700@opensimpad.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: X/Qt2 opie integration (patches included) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:34:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi schrieb: > On 07-10-2008 14:33, Bernhard Guillon wrote: >> Koen Kooi schrieb: > >> What do you think about: >> >> xqtlauncher-blackbox-config.bb >> xqtlauncher-xkbd-desktop.bb >> xqtlauncher.bb having the above as rdepends? >> >> or >> xqtlauncher-blackbox-config.bb >> xqtlauncher-xkbd-desktop.bb >> xqtlauncher.bb no depends except X/Qt2 >> and a task-xqtlauncher. >> With this we could provide support for different window managers later. >> Currently only blackbox is supported. >> >> or same as above but >> xqt2-xqtlauncher-foo-bar.bb > > Option 2 seems nice. > It took a while but here [1] it is :) Please have a look at it and comment. best regards Bernhard Guillon [1] http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4603 [2] http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4582 [3] http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4861