From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: issues with movnti emulation
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:18:44 +0100
Message-ID: <492AD3E4.9060309@eu.citrix.com>
References: <20081120171641.GJ25331@york.uk.xensource.com>	<C54B522C.1F72A%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<20081121160152.GK25331@york.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081121160152.GK25331@york.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 17:43 +0000 on 20 Nov (1227202988), Keir Fraser wrote:
>> Yes, you're probably right. I wonder if we are relying on emulation failures
>> to inform unshadowing at all often? We might have to revisit constraining
>> x86_emulate() when called by shadow code, do you think?
> 
> Yes, I think it would probably be worth looking at that.

In what kind of guest/workloads we were experiencing this corruption?

Thanks,
Gianluca