From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel ??? Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:37:40 -0800 Message-ID: <492B2CB4.6080309@oracle.com> References: <4925ECB9.4010706@oracle.com> <4929FF4A.1060308@goop.org> Reply-To: mukesh.rathor@oracle.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4929FF4A.1060308@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Yup, I started looking into it, but significant progress after holidays/vacation late January. Thanks, mukesh Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Mukesh Rathor wrote: >> Oh, cool. I was looking at syscalls on PV x86_64 guests, and one of my >> thoughts was running in HVM mode but do all MMU stuff using hypercalls >> like PV. Other than having to change the hyp domain create portions, >> setting things up, is there a technical reason it can't be done >> today... thanks, Mukesh > > It's sort of on my list of things to look at. But I'm still rather tied > up in the dom0 work, so if you want to have a stab at it, go ahead! > > J