From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Linux staging c/s 736
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:26:54 +0000
Message-ID: <492BD2EE.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Haitao Shan <haitao.shan@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

After having another (closer) look (because of the request to include this
in SLE11) I seem to have a problem understanding what struct
msi_pirq_entry's new mask_base member is actually supposed to contain:
Is this the machine address of the area, or its virtual mapping. While the
field's type is void __iomem *, attach_pirq_entry() stores an u64 into it.
If this is really mixed up the way it appears to be, then I can't see how
this could ever have worked for you.

Jan