From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Linux: enable_IO_APIC() differences between i386 and x86-64
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:20:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492C09AC.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
As I noticed only now, there's a big chunk of code in that function that's
conditionalized out for x86-64 but not for i386. I'm pretty certain these
routines should agree, though. Can anyone think of a reason this
shouldn't also be disabled for i386?
Thanks, Jan
reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492C09AC.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.