From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:02:12 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mpc83xx: New board support SIMPC8313 In-Reply-To: <20081124183714.07cf1670.kim.phillips@freescale.com> References: <472077.6475.qm@web83505.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20081124183714.07cf1670.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Message-ID: <492C2F94.20005@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Kim Phillips wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:44:18 -0800 (PST) > Ron Madrid wrote: >> This would allow for more board specific nand_spl boot code. >> Would something like this be allowed or am I barking up the >> wrong tree? > > I'd rather we find stuff that can be ifdeffed out or moved elsewhere - That's great if it's possible, but it's a very tight image and we're currently wasting 1/16 of it. > the moment we move something in there, someone will find the need to > enhance and grow whatever moved there. So put something in there that is unlikely to grow, and if it does grow, swap it with something else. I think you've gotten spoiled by the lack of resource constraints. :-) > what was the 4.2 toolchain doing differently than the 4.1 toolchain? > maybe that's an area worth looking into. Agreed, code size regressions with -Os should warrant a bug report. -Scott