From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L53dY-000448-7D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:31:52 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L53dW-00043n-Pc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:31:51 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47312 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L53dW-00043k-Jy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:31:50 -0500
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]:25876)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1L53dW-0002L3-Bp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:31:50 -0500
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so66692ana.37
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:31:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <492C52A0.2040608@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:31:44 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5780] Native BSD host USB support (Juergen Lock,
	Lonnie Mendez)
References: <E1L3zdz-0005nI-Lv@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>	<492B10B1.1050409@codemonkey.ws>
	<20081125100732.GA15592@networkno.de>	<492C0D01.8000604@codemonkey.ws>
	<f43fc5580811250937k45f7753t9fc8736d3861316a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580811250937k45f7753t9fc8736d3861316a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 11/25/08, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>   
> There is a small problem: in configure, we want to parse the command
> line options for things like cpu, compiler flags etc. So the OS or CPU
> detection should be after that.
>
> Currently the CPU from uname is used to modify the OS flags even
> before command line options are handled, this seems to be broken.
>   

Yeah, I'd agree that this is broken.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori