From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L61cg-0002wk-A7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:34:58 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L61ce-0002uT-Q1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:34:57 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54045 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L61ce-0002uD-Ew
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:34:56 -0500
Received: from gecko.sbs.de ([194.138.37.40]:22277)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>) id 1L61cd-0005rx-SN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:34:56 -0500
Message-ID: <492FD75E.9040900@siemens.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:34:54 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <200811281139.07092.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <200811281139.07092.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/6] qemu fixes
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is a series of four patches which improve support
> for qemu on NetBSD.
> 
> sys-queue.h defines _SYS_QUEUE_H_ which is also defined by
> the <sys/queue.h> system header. <sys/disk.h> uses SLIST_ENTRY
> on NetBSD, which doesn't exist in sys-queue.h. Therefore,
> include <sys/queue.h> before including sys-queue.h.

Does this patch (which my mail client unfortunately refuses to cite...)
take into account that we now have TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE which NetBSD may lack?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 ES-OS
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux