From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfrm: Cleanup for unlink SPD entry
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:57:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4933B507.3020101@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4933B488.3000406@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sorry, the title should be this:
[PATCH 2/2] xfrm: Cleanup for unlink SPD entry
Wei Yongjun wrote:
> Used __xfrm_policy_unlink() to instead of the dup codes when unlink
> SPD entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index fb216c9..0de2e1f 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(unsigned short family);
> static void xfrm_policy_put_afinfo(struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo);
> static void xfrm_init_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst);
>
> +static struct xfrm_policy *__xfrm_policy_unlink(struct xfrm_policy *pol,
> + int dir);
> +
> static inline int
> __xfrm4_selector_match(struct xfrm_selector *sel, struct flowi *fl)
> {
> @@ -602,12 +605,8 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl)
> xfrm_pol_hold(policy);
> xfrm_policy_count[dir]++;
> atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
> - if (delpol) {
> - hlist_del(&delpol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&delpol->byidx);
> - list_del(&delpol->walk.all);
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir]--;
> - }
> + if (delpol)
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(delpol, dir);
> policy->index = delpol ? delpol->index : xfrm_gen_index(policy->type, dir);
> hlist_add_head(&policy->byidx, xfrm_policy_byidx+idx_hash(policy->index));
> policy->curlft.add_time = get_seconds();
> @@ -679,10 +678,7 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(u8 type, int dir,
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> return pol;
> }
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir]--;
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> }
> ret = pol;
> break;
> @@ -723,10 +719,7 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_byid(u8 type, int dir, u32 id, int delete,
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> return pol;
> }
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir]--;
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> }
> ret = pol;
> break;
> @@ -807,17 +800,14 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> for (dir = 0; dir < XFRM_POLICY_MAX; dir++) {
> struct xfrm_policy *pol;
> struct hlist_node *entry;
> - int i, killed;
> + int i;
>
> - killed = 0;
> again1:
> hlist_for_each_entry(pol, entry,
> &xfrm_policy_inexact[dir], bydst) {
> if (pol->type != type)
> continue;
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
>
> xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, audit_info->loginuid,
> @@ -825,7 +815,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> audit_info->secid);
>
> xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
> - killed++;
>
> write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> goto again1;
> @@ -838,9 +827,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> bydst) {
> if (pol->type != type)
> continue;
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
>
> xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1,
> @@ -848,14 +835,11 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> audit_info->sessionid,
> audit_info->secid);
> xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
> - killed++;
>
> write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> goto again2;
> }
> }
> -
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir] -= killed;
> }
> atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
> out:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-01 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-01 2:00 [PATCH] xfrm: Fix kernel panic when flush and dump SPD entries Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 2:10 ` [PATCHv2] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 2:17 ` Yang Hongyang
2008-12-01 5:00 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-01 6:25 ` Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 6:27 ` [PATCHv3] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 7:50 ` [PATCH v4] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 8:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-01 8:38 ` David Miller
2008-12-01 9:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-03 8:28 ` David Miller
2008-12-01 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfrm: Cleanup for unlink SPD entry Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 9:57 ` Wei Yongjun [this message]
2008-12-02 6:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-03 8:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4933B507.3020101@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.