From: Ondrej Valousek <webserv@s3group.cz>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: "autofs@linux.kernel.org" <autofs@linux.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Low priority question: negative cache in autofs5
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:20:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49391C76.8030704@s3group.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228477716.3033.37.camel@zeus.themaw.net>
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the quick reply. And what is the answer to the first question
please (regarding lstat & wildcard entry)? :-)
It is not he same case I guess....
Many thanks,
Ondrej
Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:30 +0100, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>
>> Probably to Ian:
>> I am just looking in the autofs5 (from RHEL5) source. I have an indirect
>> nis map:
>> auto.master:
>> /appli auto.appli
>> /proj auto.proj
>>
>> Now, auto.proj contains a wildcard entry (* nfsserver:/share/&) but
>> auto.appli does not.
>>
>> 1. Every time I try to enter (shortly after each other)
>> /proj/nonexistent_directory, I got this:
>> Dec 5 12:10:45 ara automount[3101]: rmdir_path: lstat of
>> /proj/nonexistent_directory failed
>> ... why did not the negative cache save us the expensive call to lstat?
>>
>>
>> 2. Every time I try to enter (shortly after each other)
>> /appli/nonexistent_directory, I got this:
>> Dec 5 12:11:41 ara automount[3101]: lookup_mount: lookup(yp): key
>> "nonexistent" not found in map
>> ... again, looks like the nis daemon was consulted but the negative
>> cache should take the place.
>>
>
> Known bug with v5 handling of negative caching of non-existent keys.
> I'm working on it but it is proving a little bit tricky because of
> possible multiple map sources listed in nsswitch.conf (at least that's
> where I'm currently at).
>
>
>> Maybe I do not understand the concept of negative caching well....
>>
>
> No .. you got it right .. I missed it.
>
> Another thing, there are quite a few changes going into RHEL-5.3 autofs
> which will make their way into RHEL-4.8 in due course. Hopefully you
> will not get caught by them but it is worth logging calls for issues in
> case you are seeing a known issue.
>
> Ian
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-05 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 11:30 Low priority question: negative cache in autofs5 Ondrej Valousek
2008-12-05 11:48 ` Ian Kent
2008-12-05 12:20 ` Ondrej Valousek [this message]
2008-12-05 13:10 ` Ian Kent
2008-12-05 13:30 ` Ondrej Valousek
2008-12-05 13:44 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49391C76.8030704@s3group.cz \
--to=webserv@s3group.cz \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.