From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ondrej Valousek <webserv@s3group.cz>
Subject: Re: Low priority question: negative cache in autofs5
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:30:08 +0100
Message-ID: <49392CE0.8010004@s3group.cz>
References: <493910C7.9010308@s3group.cz>	
	<1228477716.3033.37.camel@zeus.themaw.net>
	<49391C76.8030704@s3group.cz>
	<1228482604.14030.15.camel@zeus.themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1228482604.14030.15.camel@zeus.themaw.net>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: "autofs@linux.kernel.org" <autofs@linux.kernel.org>


> The negative cache working properly will return a fail immediately so
> you shouldn't see this.
>
> But then it shouldn't happen for the first case either.
> There are quite a few changes scheduled for the next update and I
> haven't seen this for a while now so it's a bit hard to get exited about
> it.
>
>   
Ok, I understand - in summary:
#1 problem should go [hopefully] away with 5.3
#2 problem is known bug being worked on....
Thanks!
O.