From: Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
Cristiano Prisciandaro <cristiano.p@solnet.ch>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpufreq: eeepc 900 frequency scaling driver
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:55:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493BF1D4.7090602@compton.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081206163539.GB7623@srcf.ucam.org>
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It appears to be implemented in the 900 and 901 BIOSes as well, so some
> kind of limitation is probably needed. The best approach would probably
> to check whether the CPU has the EST flag. Just do something like:
>
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu = &cpu_data(policy->cpu);
>
> if (cpu->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || cpu_has(cpu, X86_FEATURE_EST))
> return -ENODEV
>
> at the top of the cpufreq init code. That way you'll refuse to bind on
> anything that implements speedstep and acpi-cpufreq can be used instead.
Sounds like a good idea - here's a new version with that check added:
--- kmod-eeepc-laptop-2.6.28rc5/eeepc-laptop.c 2008-11-20 09:24:41.000000000 +0000
+++ kmod-eeepc-laptop-cpufreq/eeepc-laptop.c 2008-12-07 15:54:07.000000000 +0000
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/fb.h>
#include <linux/hwmon.h>
#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -731,6 +732,118 @@
};
/*
+ * Cpufreq
+ *
+ * Based on work by Cristiano P. <cris69@solnet.ch>
+ */
+static struct cpufreq_frequency_table eeepc_cpufreq_table[] = {
+ {0, 630000},
+ {1, 900000},
+ {0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END}
+};
+
+static unsigned int eeepc_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ switch (get_acpi(CM_ASL_CPUFV)) {
+ case 0x200:
+ return 900000;
+ case 0x201:
+ return 630000;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void eeepc_cpufreq_set(unsigned int frequency)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+
+ freqs.cpu = 0;
+ freqs.old = eeepc_cpufreq_get(0);
+ freqs.new = frequency;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+
+ switch (frequency) {
+ case 900000:
+ set_acpi(CM_ASL_CPUFV, 0);
+ break;
+ case 630000:
+ set_acpi(CM_ASL_CPUFV, 1);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+
+ return;
+}
+
+static int eeepc_cpufreq_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, eeepc_cpufreq_table);
+}
+
+static int eeepc_cpufreq_target (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq,
+ unsigned int relation)
+{
+ unsigned int newstate = 0;
+
+ if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, eeepc_cpufreq_table,
+ target_freq, relation, &newstate))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ eeepc_cpufreq_set(eeepc_cpufreq_table[newstate].frequency);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int eeepc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu = &cpu_data(policy->cpu);
+
+ /* Defer to acpi-cpufreq if this CPU has SpeedStep support */
+ if (cpu->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || cpu_has(cpu, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (get_acpi(CM_ASL_CPUFV) < 0)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000000;
+ policy->cur = eeepc_cpufreq_get(policy->cpu);
+
+ if (cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, eeepc_cpufreq_table))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(eeepc_cpufreq_table, policy->cpu);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int eeepc_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr(policy->cpu);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct freq_attr *eeepc_cpufreq_attr[] = {
+ &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct cpufreq_driver eeepc_cpufreq_driver = {
+ .verify = eeepc_cpufreq_verify,
+ .target = eeepc_cpufreq_target,
+ .init = eeepc_cpufreq_cpu_init,
+ .exit = eeepc_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
+ .get = eeepc_cpufreq_get,
+ .name = "eeepc",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .attr = eeepc_cpufreq_attr,
+};
+
+/*
* exit/init
*/
static void eeepc_backlight_exit(void)
@@ -759,10 +872,16 @@
eeepc_hwmon_device = NULL;
}
+static void eeepc_cpufreq_exit(void)
+{
+ cpufreq_unregister_driver(&eeepc_cpufreq_driver);
+}
+
static void __exit eeepc_laptop_exit(void)
{
eeepc_backlight_exit();
eeepc_hwmon_exit();
+ eeepc_cpufreq_exit();
acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&eeepc_hotk_driver);
sysfs_remove_group(&platform_device->dev.kobj,
&platform_attribute_group);
@@ -810,6 +929,11 @@
return result;
}
+static int eeepc_cpufreq_init(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return cpufreq_register_driver(&eeepc_cpufreq_driver);
+}
+
static int __init eeepc_laptop_init(void)
{
struct device *dev;
@@ -837,6 +961,9 @@
result = eeepc_hwmon_init(dev);
if (result)
goto fail_hwmon;
+ result = eeepc_cpufreq_init(dev);
+ if (result)
+ goto fail_cpufreq;
/* Register platform stuff */
result = platform_driver_register(&platform_driver);
if (result)
@@ -861,6 +988,8 @@
fail_platform_device1:
platform_driver_unregister(&platform_driver);
fail_platform_driver:
+ eeepc_cpufreq_exit();
+fail_cpufreq:
eeepc_hwmon_exit();
fail_hwmon:
eeepc_backlight_exit();
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-23 15:27 [PATCH 1/1] cpufreq: eeepc 900 frequency scaling driver Cristiano Prisciandaro
2008-11-23 18:04 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-02 16:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-02 20:14 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-16 4:24 ` Len Brown
2009-03-16 8:29 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-17 8:30 ` Fabio Comolli
2009-03-17 8:59 ` Fabio Comolli
2008-11-24 9:38 ` Tom Hughes
2008-11-24 15:13 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-11-24 16:36 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-11-24 16:41 ` [Acpi4asus-user] " Corentin Chary
2008-11-24 16:48 ` Tom Hughes
2008-11-24 16:58 ` Corentin Chary
2008-11-24 17:07 ` Tom Hughes
2008-11-24 16:46 ` Tom Hughes
2008-11-24 23:02 ` Cristiano Prisciandaro
2009-04-05 7:43 ` [Acpi4asus-user] " Corentin Chary
2009-04-05 7:43 ` Corentin Chary
2009-04-05 10:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-05 11:39 ` Grigori Goronzy
2008-11-24 16:39 ` Tom Hughes
2008-11-24 19:09 ` Cristiano Prisciandaro
2008-12-03 19:26 ` Tom Hughes
2008-12-04 1:57 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-12-05 23:05 ` Tom Hughes
2008-12-06 16:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-07 15:55 ` Tom Hughes [this message]
2008-12-09 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493BF1D4.7090602@compton.nu \
--to=tom@compton.nu \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristiano.p@solnet.ch \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.