From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] synchronized TSC between vcpu's on SMP guests
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:38:08 +0300
Message-ID: <493E58A0.8080109@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
References: <20081209011247.570596925@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Serebrin <benjamin.serebrin@amd.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.150]:21296 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752089AbYLILiK (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:38:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20081209011247.570596925@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Most Intel hosts are supposed to have their TSC's synchronized. This
> patchset attempts to fix the sites which overwrite the TSC making them
> appear unsynchronized to the guest.

By the way, phenoms are also supposed to have synced TSCs, at least
the host reports TSC syncronization works.  But guests still thinks
TSC is unstable, even on uniprocessor guests using kvm_clock...

Is it related to the area you're patching?

Thanks!

/mjt