From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
Subject: [refpolicy] kernel_corecommands.patch
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:43:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493E75F6.5020604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493A777C.3010409@martinorr.name>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Orr wrote:
> On 02/12/08 22:51, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 16:35 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/kernel_corecommands.patch
>>>
>>> Add bin_t for ConsoleKit scripts
>> Merged, with some rearrangement.
>
> It is not clear to me - why should these be labelled as bin_t instead of
> consolekit_exec_t? Are they run by anything other than consolekit?
>
> Best wishes,
>
not currently, but we do not always label all binaries with a context
that can cause a transition. And theoretically these scripts could be
used by another application. Just because a script is labeled bin_t and
can be executed by a confined domain, does not mean it adds any privs to
the confined domain. bin_t apps will execute in the current domain.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkk+dfYACgkQrlYvE4MpobOefACfUaDejpp4pNWIVfF8CkID3in4
72wAnRJbvS4BZoUiINyDFr2lfdhIoXqN
=xek3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-09 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 21:35 [refpolicy] kernel_corecommands.patch Daniel J Walsh
2008-12-02 22:51 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2008-12-06 13:00 ` Martin Orr
2008-12-09 13:43 ` Daniel J Walsh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-04 21:28 Daniel J Walsh
2009-03-05 15:06 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-05-21 15:13 Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-11 15:39 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-11-12 20:57 Daniel J Walsh
2009-11-23 18:47 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2010-02-23 21:33 Daniel J Walsh
2010-03-05 15:54 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2010-06-02 20:18 Daniel J Walsh
2010-06-07 13:04 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2010-08-26 22:45 Daniel J Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493E75F6.5020604@redhat.com \
--to=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=refpolicy@oss.tresys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.