From: Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] waitfd: file descriptor to wait on child processes
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493EBD23.3020800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081209170543.59b4fb73@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
>> prototype for a fourth: waitfd. It pretty much does what the name
>> suggests: reading from it yields a series of status ints (as would be
>> written into the second argument of waitpid) for child processes that
>> have changed state. It takes essentially the same arguments as waitpid
>> (for now) and supports the same set of features.
>>
>
> This propogates the fundamental braindamage of waitpid - the fact the
> notification only works on child process trees.
>
> Here is a more elegant suggestion - use epoll, inotify and friends fully
> on /proc process nodes.
>
> Alan
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Last I checked inotify was not supported in /proc, or at least most of
it. What kind of work load is it to change that?
--CJD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-09 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 17:00 [RFC PATCH] waitfd: file descriptor to wait on child processes Casey Dahlin
2008-12-09 17:05 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-09 17:12 ` Scott James Remnant
2008-12-09 18:46 ` Casey Dahlin [this message]
2008-12-09 19:04 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-09 19:21 ` Casey Dahlin
2008-12-09 19:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-12-09 20:09 ` Casey Dahlin
2008-12-12 23:28 ` Scott James Remnant
2008-12-13 4:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-12-13 8:43 ` Scott James Remnant
2008-12-13 18:39 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493EBD23.3020800@redhat.com \
--to=cdahlin@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott@netsplit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.