From: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] ppc4xx: Add PPC4xx SPI helpers to Sequoia
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:11:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493EC2EC.4050602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081209185341.71DAD834B020@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ben Warren,
>
> In message <493EA876.7090008@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
>> Why not enable this feature on Sequoia? Wolfgang's argument for keeping
>> the patch out then goes away. IMHO, eval boards should have as many
>> options enabled by default as possible, and the user then has the option
>> to opt out.
>>
>
> But there is not a single SPI device on the Sequoia board, and if you
> attach one, you have to write driver code for it that implements the
> chip select handling and the specific device protocol. We would have
> a driver included, without any "users" (code that actually calls
> these functions).
>
>
Sure. Ignorant assumption on my part that the eval board had something
like a SPI EEPROM, but it looks like there's just a header. In that
case, the only advantage to including it is to ensure the driver keeps
up with any API changes.
> In other words, this driver is a prerequisite for other SPI device
> drivers that might follow later, but as is, it's just a waste of
> memory.
>
> It would just waste memory to enable it.
>
>
OK, but who cares about memory on an evaluation board? Their entire
raison-d'etre is to serve as a starting point for custom boards. I know
if I was building a board with this CPU and planned on using SPI, it
would be much nicer if the driver was included than having to search the
message boards. Just my 2c.
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
>
regards,
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-09 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 16:26 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] ppc4xx: Add PPC4xx SPI helpers to Sequoia Steven A. Falco
2008-12-09 16:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-09 17:18 ` Ben Warren
2008-12-09 17:28 ` Steven A. Falco
2008-12-09 18:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-09 19:07 ` Steven A. Falco
2008-12-09 19:12 ` Stefan Roese
2008-12-09 19:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-09 19:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-09 19:11 ` Ben Warren [this message]
2008-12-09 20:38 ` Steven A. Falco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493EC2EC.4050602@gmail.com \
--to=biggerbadderben@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.