All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>,
	qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:34:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4940273.pi2bWg8tAl@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427110503.GB24887@virgil.suse.cz>

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 13:05:03 Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 April 2016 09:06:54 Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > >>>>> "Arnd" == Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> > > 
> > > Arnd> I don't think we can realistically blacklist gcc-4.9.{0,1,2,3},
> > > Arnd> gcc-5.{0,1,2,3}.* and gcc-6.0 and require everyone to upgrade to
> > > Arnd> compilers that have not been released yet in order to build a
> > > Arnd> linux-4.6 kernel.
> > > 
> > > I agree that compiler blacklisting is problematic and I'd like to avoid
> > > it. The question is how far we go in the kernel to accommodate various
> > > levels of brokenness.
> > > 
> > > In any case. Sticking compiler workarounds in device driver code is akin
> > > to putting demolition orders on display on Alpha Centauri. At the very
> > > minimum the patch should put a fat comment in the code stating that
> > > these wrapper functions or #defines should not be changed in the future
> > > because that'll break builds using gcc XYZ. But that does not solve the
> > > problem for anybody else that might be doing something similar.
> > > Converting between u64 and $RANDOM_TYPE in an inline wrapper does not
> > > seem like a rare and unusual programming pattern.
> > 
> > It's not the driver really, it's the core scsi/fc layer, which makes
> > it a little dangerous that a random driver.
> > 
> > I agree that putting a comment in would also help. What I understand
> > from the bug report is that to trigger this bug you need these elements:
> > 
> > 1. an inline function marked __always_inline
> > 2. another inline function that is automatically inlined (not __always_inline)
> > 3. CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y to guarantee 2
> > 4. __builtin_compatible_p inside that inline function
> 
> The __always_inline requirement is not true.  In fact, if you look at
> the example testcase filed in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646#c7 you'll see it
> uses __builtin_compatible_p in an __always inline function that is
> called from one that is not tagged with that attribute.
>
> And generally speaking, always inline is never a requirement, any call
> or chain of calls that the inliner can decide to inline can lead to
> the bug (if it complies with the condition below).

Ok, thanks for the clarification, I thought you always had to have both
kinds of inline functions.
 
> What is a requirement, though, is that __builtin_compatible_p is
> called on something passed in an argument by reference or in an
> aggregate (i.e. struct or array) argument.
> 
> So,
> 
>   int foo1 (unsigned long *ref)
>   {
>     if (__builtin_constant (*ref))
>       ...
>     else
>       /* wrongly unreachable code */
>   }
> 
>   }
> 
> cannot, and is fine.  But please note that wrapping a foo[12]-like
> function into a dereferencing wrapper might not help if foo[12] would
> be early-inlined into such wrapper (GCC has two inliners, a very
> simple early-inliner that only handles simple cases and a full-blown
> IPA inliner that contains the bug).  I believe this can be ensured by
> making the wrapper always_inline and never calling it indirectly (via
> a pointer).  Honza (CCed), you know inlining heuristics better, please
> correct me if my last statement is somehow inaccurate (or indeed if
> you have a better idea how kernel developers can make sure they do not
> hit the bug).

I guess that means that any user of this code in the kernel:

static inline __attribute_const__ __u64 __fswab64(__u64 val)
{
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
        return __builtin_bswap64(val);
#elif defined (__arch_swab64)
        return __arch_swab64(val);
#elif defined(__SWAB_64_THRU_32__)
        __u32 h = val >> 32;
        __u32 l = val & ((1ULL << 32) - 1);
        return (((__u64)__fswab32(l)) << 32) | ((__u64)(__fswab32(h)));
#else
        return ___constant_swab64(val);
#endif
}

#define __swab64(x)                             \
        (__builtin_constant_p((__u64)(x)) ?     \
        ___constant_swab64(x) :                 \
        __fswab64(x))

static __always_inline __u64 __swab64p(const __u64 *p)
{       
#ifdef __arch_swab64p
        return __arch_swab64p(p);
#else
        return __swab64(*p);
#endif
}

has a chance of running into the same problem, and we may want to solve
it at the root. For architectures that define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
(i.e. ARM, MIPS, POWERPC, S390, and x86 with gcc-4.4 or higher, 4.8
for __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__), we can probably just change the logic
to avoid __builtin_constant_p() and always use __builtin_bswap64().

This won't help on TILE, which is the one architecture that sets
ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING but does not set ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP.
Chris Metcalf should be able to figure out whether we can just
set ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP for tile as well.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-27 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 19:45 [PATCH] asm-generic: force inlining of some atomic_long operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  3:36   ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 12:12     ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-13 12:36       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 15:15         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 16:55           ` James Bottomley
2016-04-13 17:10             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 15:29               ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-14 15:57                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 17:09                   ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-15  5:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-15 13:47                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-15 22:20                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-16  9:03                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-18 13:39                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:07                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:12                                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:21                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19  8:52                               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-19 13:56                                 ` [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-22 23:17                                   ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-25 16:07                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-26  2:40                                     ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26  3:37                                       ` James Bottomley
2016-04-26  7:22                                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26  8:35                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 10:05                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 13:06                                           ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 15:58                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 22:36                                               ` James Bottomley
2016-04-27  0:44                                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-27 11:05                                               ` Martin Jambor
2016-04-27 21:34                                                 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-04-28 14:58                                                   ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 14:58                                                     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 15:23                                                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 15:48                                                       ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 15:48                                                         ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-27 22:00                                                 ` [PATCH, RFT] byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 22:11                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-28 16:27                                                     ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-16  7:42                       ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 13:22                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of unaligned byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4940273.pi2bWg8tAl@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambor@suse.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.