From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LAZI7-00035I-C5 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:20:31 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2008 00:16:26 -0000 Received: from BAA57ca.baa.pppool.de (EHLO [192.168.178.35]) [77.128.87.202] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 11 Dec 2008 01:16:26 +0100 X-Authenticated: #2218979 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19r2vkPATFrjnBrDd4fzh9cut6dbnVMhOCuRE6Frh 7AD8F0HXK7fgKw Message-ID: <49405BD7.2010801@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:16:23 +0100 From: Thomas Kunze User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20081210234910.GA16050@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: <20081210234910.GA16050@excalibur.local> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 Subject: Re: [RFC] Ship dbus config and dbus service activation files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:20:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stefan Schmidt schrieb: > Hello. > > While playing to get connman 0.1 running I found that we don't ship two files in > the wpa-supplicant that come in handy. > > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/dbus-wpa_supplicant.conf > > That one is really needed. Without it a wpa-supplicant -u barks out about wrong > security. > > /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/dbus-wpa_supplicant.service > > This one is a nice-to-have. It allows autostart the service with the service > activation infrastructure from dbus. If a bus name listed in such a file is > called and not available it gets started the way described in this file. > > The following patch i nstalls the files correctly for me. Never used FILES_${PN} > before so I would like to get some review before. > Maybe its better to create a package wpasupplicant-dbus. IMO we should try to split packages if we can and the dbus functionallity is clearly separable from wpasupplicant core functions. Regards, Thomas