From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.145.245.200] (helo=mx04.dls.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LAkmA-0003Wk-QP for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:36:19 +0100 Received: from [209.242.7.188] (helo=[192.168.231.111]) by mx04.dls.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LAkiD-00065t-QZ for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:32:13 -0600 Message-ID: <49410819.6040302@dls.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:31:21 -0600 From: "Mike (mwester)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081105 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <20081210234910.GA16050@excalibur.local> <49405BD7.2010801@gmx.de> <200812110137.01104.mickey@vanille-media.de> <4940650B.1000802@dls.net> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFC] Ship dbus config and dbus service activation files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:36:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi rudely writes: > On 11-12-08 01:55, Mike (mwester) wrote: > > http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/repo/?pkgname=dbus-1 > http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/repo/?pkgname=libdbus-1-3 > > Now where do you see it the _packages_ depending on libx11-6? Is dbus > going to be the new python where everybody starts screaming about > requiring X at runtime, when it's only a buildtime dep to build an > *optional* subpackage like python-tk? Please stop with the FUD. dbus-1 recommends dbus-x11, dbus-x11 depends libx11-6 (and other X libs). So there you go, opkg install blows up your flash space by pulling in numerous X libs. No FUD - very real concern. (But if it's not a concern for Angstrom, then fine -- please ignore this issue; if I fix it, I'll make sure that it won't change for Angstrom.) Regards Mike (mwester)