From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edward Shishkin Subject: Re: The reiser4 programming style is recursive? Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:57:31 +0300 Message-ID: <4941467B.30308@gmail.com> References: <494035ED.4000706@gmx.de> <49404165.6050806@gmail.com> <49405D98.7000402@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49405D98.7000402@gmx.de> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ralph Ulrich Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Ralph Ulrich wrote: > Edward Shishkin schrieb: > >> AFAIK they were unhappy with assertions and "coding nits" like >> if (foo) { bar(); } >> > .... > >> Eventually akpm said that assertions are okay and guys send >> cleanup patches against other issues once in a while. >> > > And what are Your plans to get reiser4 in the kernel now! > I wouldn't force the events: there is no hurry, business plans, timelines, etc.. > As of now it seems that brtfs, > which has nearly the same "hardware" logic as reiser4 > but lacks the whole ground breaking philosophy, > will get there first! > And what? I don't see any problems if someone gets it prior to reiser4. > Edward, we are all waiting, what do you need for help? > To maintain at least one reiser4 subsystem would be real help.. However, it requires a victim in the person of some student(s), who is ready to kill the best years by sitting in front of monitor and studying reiser4 sources.. Do you know such ones? ;) Edward.