Blue Swirl wrote: > On 12/13/08, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Blue Swirl wrote: >> > Revision: 5998 >> > http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=5998 >> > Author: blueswir1 >> > Date: 2008-12-13 08:16:43 +0000 (Sat, 13 Dec 2008) >> > >> > Log Message: >> > ----------- >> > Fix TARGET_LONG_BITS warning in TCG >> > >> > Looking at tcg/tcg.c:828, the bug that the warning indicated would show up as >> > incorrect PC shown in log, only on 32 bit big endian host emulating a 64 bit >> > target, -d op flag enabled. Now that dyngen is gone, the patch can be applied. >> > >> > Modified Paths: >> > -------------- >> > trunk/tcg/tcg-runtime.c >> > >> > Modified: trunk/tcg/tcg-runtime.c >> > =================================================================== >> > --- trunk/tcg/tcg-runtime.c 2008-12-12 20:02:52 UTC (rev 5997) >> > +++ trunk/tcg/tcg-runtime.c 2008-12-13 08:16:43 UTC (rev 5998) >> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ >> > >> > #include "config.h" >> > #include "osdep.h" >> > +#include "cpu.h" // For TARGET_LONG_BITS >> > #include "tcg.h" >> > >> > int64_t tcg_helper_shl_i64(int64_t arg1, int64_t arg2) >> > >> >> >> Nice that this warning is finally fixed - but what is the point of >> including all those headers at all here? [1] worked well for me while >> reducing dependencies. > > I think all header files should be checked and even reorganized when > necessary. One item is the dyngen removal, cpu.h/exec.h distinction is > not clear for all targets and headers used by both user and system > emulators could be adjusted. Header files in hw should be OK, but > worth checking. Header dependencies and usage policies should be rechecked and probably cleaned up now, no question (see also my dyngen-exec.h problems). But here I was referring to the need of this _particular_ C file for any header except inttypes.h. Why including headers _here_ for no use? Jan