From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: Disabling cirrus-vga Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:03:40 +0000 Message-ID: <49478B0C.30907@eu.citrix.com> References: <6b5ba5140812111649r4275a3cu3ece54d56965a733@mail.gmail.com> <6b5ba5140812112130xcb532e8r5256651d2b37be86@mail.gmail.com> <49423DF4.4060709@eu.citrix.com> <6b5ba5140812120446q7afb3244of5e705a1e6e7b274@mail.gmail.com> <6b5ba5140812121658u630657f0i232b6971d46d26f1@mail.gmail.com> <6b5ba5140812150136j7b421feeq5656478c122663de@mail.gmail.com> <4946357C.6090206@eu.citrix.com> <6b5ba5140812150258v524eac52rd62ebc1278f498c9@mail.gmail.com> <49464844.6000107@eu.citrix.com> <515922b50812151132l278f4ba0pf99b0fc3b7b1e971@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <515922b50812151132l278f4ba0pf99b0fc3b7b1e971@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Trolle Selander Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Trolle Selander wrote: > Maybe it would be a good idea if the "nographic" option actually removed > all virtual graphics cards? Is anyone out there actually running with > the nographic option and still depending on the presence of a virtual > VGA card in the VM? Until this thread, I actually thought the nographic > option did just this, and it still strikes me as a more "logical" > behavior, but maybe changing it now would break existing setups. > nographic is an old qemu cmd line option (since 2003), I doubt people would be very happy if we change the meaning of it. However we could add a new one.