All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nterry <nigel@nigelterry.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Problem
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:39:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49481214.2070700@nigelterry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4946E31A.7040803@nigelterry.net>

nterry wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
>>
>> An alternate fix in this case would be
>>
>>   mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdb
>>
>> to remove the old superblock that is confusing things.
>>
>> NeilBrown
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>   
> That fails as:
>
> [root@homepc ~]# mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdb
> mdadm: Couldn't open /dev/sdb for write - not zeroing
> [root@homepc ~]#
>
> I also discovered that /dev/sdc appears to have a superblock which 
> maybe explains why # mdadm --examine --scan throws up three arrays.  
> Trying to zero the superblock on /dev/sdc gives the same error.
OK, I solved it, but not in a clean manner.  I had to remove /dev/sdb1 
from the array before I could zero the superblock on /dev/sdb  as below:

[root@homepc ~]# mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/sdb1
mdadm: set /dev/sdb1 faulty in /dev/md0
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/sdb1
mdadm: hot removed /dev/sdb1
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm --zero-superblock --verbose /dev/sdb
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm /dev/md0 --re-add /dev/sdb1
mdadm: re-added /dev/sdb1
[root@homepc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sdb1[4] sdd1[0] sdc1[3] sde1[1]
      735334656 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [UU_U]
      [>....................]  recovery =  0.0% (204800/245111552) 
finish=79.6min speed=51200K/sec
     
unused devices: <none>

I did this on both sdb and sdc and now I only have the one array when I 
mdadm --examine --scan --verbose.  However is there a better way to do 
this that doesn't involve a full recovery?  I thought --re-add would 
handle that?


      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-16 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-14 13:41 Raid 5 Problem nterry
2008-12-14 15:34 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 20:41   ` nterry
2008-12-14 20:53     ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-14 20:58       ` nterry
2008-12-14 21:03         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-14 21:08           ` Nigel J. Terry
2008-12-14 22:55           ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 21:14     ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-14 21:34       ` nterry
2008-12-14 22:02         ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-15 21:50         ` Neil Brown
2008-12-15 23:07           ` nterry
2008-12-16 20:39             ` nterry [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49481214.2070700@nigelterry.net \
    --to=nigel@nigelterry.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=soltys@ziu.info \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.