From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Simon Wunderlich Subject: Re: Bonding Alternating Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4948508.lctyQggAPn@prime> In-Reply-To: <7e8fe0e7bf7b42baac350b20f2a0846a@viasat.com> References: <8679334.VDzE56WMh6@prime> <2528179.d2XtbQqvsD@prime> <7e8fe0e7bf7b42baac350b20f2a0846a@viasat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2521225.qI6e1uoXLY"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: To: "b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org" , "Edmisten, Brian" --nextPart2521225.qI6e1uoXLY Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; protected-headers="v1" From: Simon Wunderlich To: "b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org" , "Edmisten, Brian" Subject: Re: Bonding Alternating Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4948508.lctyQggAPn@prime> In-Reply-To: <7e8fe0e7bf7b42baac350b20f2a0846a@viasat.com> References: <8679334.VDzE56WMh6@prime> <2528179.d2XtbQqvsD@prime> <7e8fe0e7bf7b42baac350b20f2a0846a@viasat.com> Hi Brian, I've checked it out and can confirm your issues. The bonding code as currently implemented is trying to use a different router from each routing table towards the same originator[1]. However, with 1-hop Ethernet links those routers are always the same in all the routing tables. With WiFi that would be a bit different (I've commented out the WiFi penalty check), but even then it only alternates between two of the three interfaces. At this point I don't have a straight forward fix for this. Will you use three Ethernet devices in your later deployment, or will those be WiFi interfaces? Also, would it be useful for you to consider bonding/teams interfaces of the Linux kernel to bond the link, and give that to batman-adv? Cheers, Simon [1] https://www.open-mesh.org/projects/batman-adv/wiki/Network-wide-multi-link-optimization On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 4:58:58 PM CEST Edmisten, Brian wrote: > Simon, > > Thank you. I appreciate you looking at this. > > Regards, > Brian Edmisten > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Wunderlich [mailto:sw@simonwunderlich.de] > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 12:26 AM > To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org; Edmisten, Brian > > Subject: Re: Bonding Alternating > > Hi Brian, > > hmm, I see. I will try to set up this scenario over the next few days and > let you know. I haven't used bonding for quite a while now, but I also don't > think that we had changes in the code which would break it. > > Anyway, will test and let you know. > > Cheers, > Simon > > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 6:57:37 PM CEST Edmisten, Brian wrote: > > Simon, > > > > I did check again. batctl bonding responds with enabled. > > > > Cheers, > > Brian Edmisten --nextPart2521225.qI6e1uoXLY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE1ilQI7G+y+fdhnrfoSvjmEKSnqEFAmFJ6TsACgkQoSvjmEKS nqExtw/8DvoXN+S5a4m2vpXkRItdbkmNlOCmkOVyrK4T8WaA/zbGZM9+HmObaNtu cR7QtBhJmXI9bTrKMQJ5jiq/ivh7NbIbP/hGbYT9UAvzIKHgbB1cqGHXaCxcJzG2 rZe6GH4651QtEE5sMIgSVLzhNqb0q+V8IwuwIGcz2ns0L6lub8mGyKWQ8/od+Gfv HbFNspwo/hhYn1rvbSqfvg+w3PWEhDoIHbGrxJZZBXd5iA9RNHKq2idks8kVA9S3 QXhp5WPllhMmko5sXLjHTEPHu81p2vdSpdkYzJQqK+whqjMwiLnqIEDxGh/UPvy8 5OlvL+iFHxHCPlAxbpkPYPkTmE+MWhUhBMjkI7ah+5a9KnFmI7GnweHRY3pFM078 mIZVLlYMpOxgW9z3PXtc01r/quH94Y/wIHZnWsrZHvqD8HAr/2N16rz/vdnhMqBr OonlMQ+5LTeRkRUUXe8/KARB+tO00e5jouYzpaB4A6Yr9UimoUahIXHHRNosCVPw AcQMfAiv73tIjDsvCzFJdbS8gh3UtfUSAoPz1rrJpeaSHziA/4lvizRPxuOEif+W eGN955jG9HCg36LjLUbn8qHv/wJ6YpFvznDee+2LN9x0KtK0g/vIyDBaDwdaGJTx TBei3621y4J3UdNg2jROSmq4isEwsTL3qVn/l6R/aTFBkWJLgJ0= =X8x0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2521225.qI6e1uoXLY--