From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Streams Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:16:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4948DF8C.40900@superbug.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net (lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.150]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B131037EC for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from superbug.demon.co.uk ([80.176.146.252] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1LCuOE-0004GY-dA for alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:16:30 +0000 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: ALSA development List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi, There was some talk some time ago of maybe moving alsa to a streams approach instead of ring buffer and periods approach. Has anything become of this? Is there a plan to improve the abstraction between hardware and user space regarding constraints on period sizes when doing sample rate conversion? Kind Regards James