All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Zhuravlev <Alex.Zhuravlev@Sun.COM>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] global epochs [an alternative proposal, long and dry].
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:45:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494FA825.4080406@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18767.41574.948255.718042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

Nikita Danilov wrote:
> All in all, I have a feeling that _all_ such algorithms have similar
> communication overhead for the `usual' workload.

not sure what you meant by "such" and "usual", but dependency-based
recovery may have zero overhead for "usual local" workload, in terms
of network and disk traffic.

thanks, Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-22 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-22  7:53 [Lustre-devel] global epochs [an alternative proposal, long and dry] Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 11:52 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-22 12:45   ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 13:48     ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2008-12-22 14:21       ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 14:45         ` Alex Zhuravlev [this message]
2008-12-22 14:44     ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-22 17:15       ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-22 17:36         ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-22 18:57           ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23  6:44             ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 10:00               ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23 10:21                 ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 11:06                   ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23 11:31                     ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 12:50                       ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-23 13:11                         ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 13:24                           ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-24 10:32                         ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-24 11:37                           ` Nikita Danilov
2008-12-26  9:01                             ` Alex Zhuravlev
2008-12-23 23:37             ` Andreas Dilger
2008-12-24 12:35               ` Eric Barton
2008-12-24 16:16               ` Nikita Danilov
2009-01-15 23:40 ` [Lustre-devel] global epochs vs fsync Alex Zhuravlev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494FA825.4080406@sun.com \
    --to=alex.zhuravlev@sun.com \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.