From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Jike Song <albcamus@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: bugfix/utilize for msi_capability_init()
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:17:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49532592.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df9815e70812240101q23f6d59fj4121b19563a77d47@mail.gmail.com>
Jike Song wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Hidetoshi Seto
> <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> This patch fix a following bug and does a cleanup.
>>
>> bug:
>> commit 5993760f7fc75b77e4701f1e56dc84c0d6cf18d5
>> had a wrong change (since is_64 is boolean[0|1]):
>>
>> - pci_write_config_dword(dev,
>> - msi_mask_bits_reg(pos, is_64bit_address(control)),
>> - maskbits);
>> + pci_write_config_dword(dev, entry->msi_attrib.is_64, maskbits);
>>
> Yes, really a nasty bug. I'm feeling guilty...
> Should this fix hit 2.6.28 release? I CCed Jesse for his point.
Unfortunately we failed to take this fix into Santa's bag...
Note that this bug affects mask condition after calling pci_enable_msi()
for devices with MSI capability with (optional) per-vector masking support.
Devices with MSI-X or MSI without masking support are safe.
Once unmask/mask_msi_irq() is called, the condition should be fixed.
And the wrong pci_write_config_dword() will have no effects because
target registers (fields in header, such as Vendor ID) are read-only.
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-25 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-24 8:27 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: bugfix/utilize for msi_capability_init() Hidetoshi Seto
2008-12-24 9:01 ` Jike Song
2008-12-25 6:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2009-01-16 18:32 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49532592.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=albcamus@gmail.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.