From: Andreas Sundstrom <sunkan@zappa.cx>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28 ext4, xen and lvm volume becomes ro after snapshot
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:48:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495526F6.9040704@zappa.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081226182145.GP9871@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso wrote:
> Hmm... ok, to summarize, you are seeing this problem with 2.6.28 (have
> you tried earlier kernel versions) when an LVM volume has a read/only
> snapshot in existence and you try to mount the LVM volume using ext4.
> If you mount the same LVM volume using ext3, you don't see any
> problems. Is that correct?
>
Correct, and I have not been using barriers with any earlier kernel.
I stumbled upon this because barriers are enabled by default in ext4.
> Can you try mounting ext3 with barriers enabled? Booting with the
> command linux option rootflags=barriers should do the trick. If that
> fails, then it would indicate that trying to enable barriers in a Xen
> guest while the host OS has created a snapshot of volume causes an I/O
> error, thus leading errors which you are seeing.
>
> - Ted
>
Yes, I mounted it with ext3 and barrier=1 and could reproduce the problem.
ext3 did not remount the fs ro though, it seems to only disable barriers:
[ 7.681759] blkfront: xvda1: write barrier op failed
[ 7.681776] blkfront: xvda1: barriers disabled
[ 7.681785] end_request: I/O error, dev xvda1, sector 4584
[ 7.681800] end_request: I/O error, dev xvda1, sector 4584
[ 7.681886] JBD: barrier-based sync failed on xvda1 - disabling barriers
And then I tested with ext4 and barrier=0 and that also works.
I don't know if this is expected behaviour or not or if it's worth
looking into.
I just wanted to report back what I saw. For me personally it's no issue.
I'll be using ext4 without barriers for a while and see how it goes.
But I'm here if you want something tested or a patch verified or anything,
but I guess this might be a Xen issue rather than vanilla kernel stuff.
Thanks for helping out with the narrowing down of the issue
/Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 11:06 2.6.28 ext4, xen and lvm volume becomes ro after snapshot Andreas Sundstrom
2008-12-26 14:07 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-26 15:42 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2008-12-26 18:21 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-26 18:48 ` Andreas Sundstrom [this message]
2008-12-26 19:33 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-26 22:00 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2008-12-27 3:06 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-27 9:19 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2009-01-02 3:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-02 8:29 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2009-01-02 14:10 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-03 10:25 ` Andreas Sundstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495526F6.9040704@zappa.cx \
--to=sunkan@zappa.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.