Re: eMPIA camera support?

[CityK <cityk@rogers.com>]

hermann pitton wrote:
> let's see. It still has lots of advantages.
>
> Hacking of hundreds of tuners and advanced gpio and eeprom detection was
> coordinated there on requests for research coming up on the lists and it
> has several thousand contributors. A wiki was not even in sight then.
>
> I would prefer to see it further maintained for easy searching on hard
> facts.
>
> At least don't call it third party.
>
> That is as mad as if you would call the video4linux-list or bytesex.org
> third party.
>
> It is/was to that point the official hardware resource and Gunther a
> leading tuner/hardware developer and nothing else.

This is true, and I don't mean to offend anyone's sensibilities about
it.  Likewise, I did state that it remains a very useful resource.

However, I haven't seen a word of boo from Gunther in probably two years
time.  Secondly, some of those users that I had, in the past, requested
that they submit material to the bttv-gallery have later written/replied
to me that their submissions went unanswered/unacknowledged.  Thirdly,
despite Gunther's distinguished history and involvement, it is likely
unclear to an unassuming end user that there is anything other then a
passing relation between the project and the "bttv-gallery".

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list