From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@intel.com>
Cc: "Liu, Kechao" <kechao.liu@intel.com>,
"'kvm@vger.kernel.org'" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] kvm-userspace: Load PCI option ROMs
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:28:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495B3B43.2090200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61563CE63B4F854986A895DA7AD3C177044E7098@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Shan, Haitao wrote:
> Hi, Avi,
>
> Option ROM already has its own BAR at 0x30h. I think the devices assignment code now already handles this register.
>
Okay good.
> Can I summary your proposals like the following: In guest BIOS, scan all the pci devices (virtual) for existance of Option ROMs. Copy them to available BIOS space in 0xC0000 - 0xDFFFF. Execute the ROM code at copied location.
>
Yes.
> I don't understand why this makes differences compared to scanning and copying Option ROMs in QEMU,
If the ROM BAR is already handled (including registering the memory when
the BAR is programmed -- I don't see that in the code), then there is no
big advantage. It's closer to how real hardware works, but that's about it.
> especially given that the VGA BIOS and etherboot ROM are also copied to BIOS space in QEMU before they execute in rom_scan loop in guest BIOS.
>
The VGA BIOS is typically present on the motherboard itself, at least on
some configurations. You're right about etherboot.
I'll apply the patch. Can you take a look at the ROM BAR?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-31 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-29 3:51 [PATCH][v2] kvm-userspace: Load PCI option ROMs Liu, Kechao
2008-12-29 8:28 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-29 9:36 ` Liu, Kechao
2008-12-29 9:49 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 1:01 ` Shan, Haitao
2008-12-30 15:51 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-31 2:06 ` Shan, Haitao
2008-12-31 9:28 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-01-03 2:29 ` Shan, Haitao
2009-01-04 2:12 ` Shan, Haitao
2009-01-04 3:54 ` Leendert van Doorn
2009-01-04 4:58 ` Shan, Haitao
2009-01-04 10:26 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 17:12 ` Leendert van Doorn
2009-01-04 17:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 17:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 17:54 ` Leendert van Doorn
2009-01-04 19:51 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 18:03 ` Kevin O'Connor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495B3B43.2090200@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=haitao.shan@intel.com \
--cc=kechao.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.