From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752908AbZADHHt (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 02:07:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750795AbZADHHk (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 02:07:40 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f20.google.com ([209.85.220.20]:43852 "EHLO mail-fx0-f20.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbZADHHk (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 02:07:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4960603F.2030002@colorfullife.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:07:43 +0100 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lai Jiangshan CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree_rcu References: <200901021159.n02BxDLg024728@mail.q-ag.de> <49604BAD.5010405@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <49604BAD.5010405@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Hi, Manfred Spraul, > > Thanks you for re-propose kfree_rcu(). > I NAK. this patch. > > Comparing with my patch(V1), your patch has several improvements. > But core idea is the same as my patch. > This idea(share offset with function pointer) has some disadvantages. > And I had implemented V2 and the patches for using kfree_rcu(). > The V2 patch has not tested enough, but It will be done in one month. > Did you already post V2, did you cc me? I couldn't find it in my e-mails. -- Manfred