From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756858AbZADIdu (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 03:33:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750933AbZADIdm (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 03:33:42 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:55640 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750860AbZADIdl (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 03:33:41 -0500 Message-ID: <496073AB.2030400@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:30:35 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manfred Spraul CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree_rcu References: <200901021159.n02BxDLg024728@mail.q-ag.de> <49604BAD.5010405@cn.fujitsu.com> <4960603F.2030002@colorfullife.com> In-Reply-To: <4960603F.2030002@colorfullife.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manfred Spraul wrote: > Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> Hi, Manfred Spraul, >> >> Thanks you for re-propose kfree_rcu(). >> I NAK. this patch. >> >> Comparing with my patch(V1), your patch has several improvements. >> But core idea is the same as my patch. >> This idea(share offset with function pointer) has some disadvantages. >> And I had implemented V2 and the patches for using kfree_rcu(). >> The V2 patch has not tested enough, but It will be done in one month. >> > Did you already post V2, did you cc me? > I couldn't find it in my e-mails. > I have not posted it. -:) Lai