Alain Knaff wrote:
> 
> What do you mean "parametrized by the arch Kconfig files"? Does this
> mean that it would still be in the global files, but would be enabled by
> some kind of switch or preprocessor macro in the arch dependant file? If
> easily doable, this would IMHO be preferable.
> 

Yes, that's what I mean.  Basically it'd use a dependency of some sort.
 It's not really clear to me right at the moment which is best, too.

Also attached another followon bug fix patch; again, you don't need to
resubmit for this.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.