From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752552AbZAECve (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:51:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752407AbZAECvN (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:51:13 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:54510 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752270AbZAECvM (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:51:12 -0500 Message-ID: <496174EB.4030601@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:48:11 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree_rcu References: <200901021159.n02BxDLg024728@mail.q-ag.de> <20090102185543.GE6842@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <49604E19.8040502@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090104194851.GM6958@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20090104194851.GM6958@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > In any case, I do apologize -- since I didn't see anything from you I > incorrectly assumed that you had given up on this patch. Please accept > my apologies! It's my fault. I'm a very low-yield developer. I have given up on unaccepted cleanup-patches, kfree_rcu() is not a cleanup for reducing lines of code, it has some significances for kernel. > > Would it be possible for you and Manfred to agree on a common patch, and > to have one of you submit it with both of you having Signed-off-by on it? > All are OK. I NAK-ed only for deferring kfree_rcu() being accepted. I'm not concerned about whether I'm patches' Author or I'm in the Signed-off-by list. Thanks, Lai.