From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sedji Gaouaou Subject: AC'97 driver for AT91SAM9263ek atmel board. Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:52:25 +0100 Message-ID: <49621EA9.8060808@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from atmel-es2.atmel.fr (mail.atmel.fr [81.80.104.162]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4531037FD for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:52:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from meyreuil.atmel.fr (meyreuil [10.159.254.132]) by atmel-es2.atmel.fr (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id n05Eo4L19095 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:50:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.159.245.197]) by meyreuil.atmel.fr (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id n05EqPS24597 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:52:25 +0100 (MET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi, I am writing because I have no feedbacks concerning a patch that I have sent on the 1st of october: http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-October/011049.html. Has anybody tested it? Is there any problem with it? Regards, Sedji