From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: hvm_set_callback_irq_level() deadlock?
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:41:48 +0900
Message-ID: <496478DC.9080309@jp.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi,

hvm_set_callback_irq_level() and so on call vioapic_irq_positive_edge()
before spin_unlock(&d->arch.hvm_domain.irq_lock).
I think it cause a deadlock.
If it is right, how should we fix them?
What do you think?

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe