From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: <ccache@lists.samba.org>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:35:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4964AF8D.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090107113138.GA29730@uranus.ravnborg.org>
>>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> 07.01.09 12:31 >>>
>What is the gain/pain ratio here?
Certainly depends on the pov - it reduces the kernel module (disk) image
sizes quite a bit, so from a distro perspective its a move against the ever
growing package sizes (and the disk space) hundreds or even thousands
of modules require.
>Would it be a possibility to drop stripping off the
>crc symbols and go back to the ld method that
>is more ccache friendly?
That's certainly a possibility, but I have to admit that I'd like to keep the
option - a respective config option could default to 'no' if the build issues
are considered more significant. I'm really not that much worried about
adding another config parameter here...
>We would still benefir from all the other stripping done - no?
Yes.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-06 15:15 [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Theodore Ts'o
2009-01-06 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 17:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 17:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:04 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 11:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 12:35 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2009-01-07 13:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 13:48 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 20:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-08 19:16 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-12 14:06 ` Gilles Espinasse
2009-01-06 17:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 16:26 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 22:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 4:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 5:10 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:03 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:37 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-08 19:17 ` Dave Jones
2009-01-08 21:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 21:48 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-11 22:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:51 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:55 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-15 13:40 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4964AF8D.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=ccache@lists.samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.