From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] net/kni: add KNI PMD
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:37:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4966535.E9V4giOa3W@xps13>
References: <20170131121819.32196-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <86596f35-f483-e493-101e-f93969bd2f1b@intel.com>
 <BY2PR05MB235928A31499706A7BA10E09AF5D0@BY2PR05MB2359.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFE22A5D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:38:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c85so28128330wmi.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:38:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR05MB235928A31499706A7BA10E09AF5D0@BY2PR05MB2359.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2017-02-17 17:52, Yong Wang:
> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
> > On 2/17/2017 1:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2017-02-17 13:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >> Add KNI PMD which wraps librte_kni for ease of use.
> > >>
> > >> KNI PMD can be used as any regular PMD to send / receive packets to the
> > >> Linux networking stack.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
> > >> ---
> 
> I have the impression that Reviewed-by is good enough for a change to be accepted, which does not seem to be the case.
> 
> Acked-by: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>

Sorry, it is not what I meant.
Your Reviewed-by is really strong to make confident the patch is good.
But Ferruh wanted to make sure more people wants this PMD.