From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: krb5 issues
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:12:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4966724.aFqryVVfLb@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5744603D.9020504@kenbass.com>
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:07:57 AM Ken Bass wrote:
> On 05/23/2016 11:21 AM, Ken Bass wrote:
> > I enabled krb5 in my audisp-remote and audispd-remote reports "GSS-API
> > error sending token length" and fails to log remotely.
> >
> > If I reboot the destination auditd server AFTER the clients are
> > running it appears to work. But if I reboot any clients machine,
> > logging from that rebooted machine fails.
> > I created my service principals using freeipa - all systems are clean
> > installs of Centos 7.2.
> >
> > For now, I disabled krb5, but that is not a good solution.
>
> After disabling krb5 and rebooting the client servers several times I am
> seeing similar problems. I am seeing a dozen or so log file entries of
>
> Too many connections from 10.10.10.10:39107 - rejected
>
> I only have 2 clients and all I am doing is rebooting them. I tried
> increasing the tcp_listen_queue to 20 (from the default of 5) which made
> no difference.
>
> I seem to have traced it to needing to specify the tcp_client_ports to
> 60 rather than using whatever the default was. What would have been
> blocking this?
I think 60 is the default in the audit config files. IPtables/firewalld needs to
be opened and selinux is expecting port 60.
> And why only when the clients are rebooted second does it
> fail?
>
> After changing this the Kerberos works, so I think the 'error sending
> token length' is basically the same message but in a different code path
> to indicate the connection is rejected / cannot write to the TCP socket.
>
> Was the commented out ##tcp_client_ports parameter supposed to be
> changed by the end user? Was the defaults supposed to work?
There is some discussion of this in the man pages. Ports < 1024 are
privileged. If its higher they you can have someone dump spoofed log events in
the aggregating server. So, setting the port low gives a small amount of trust
that it might be real events from a real system. You should also use
tcp_wrappers to make sure specific systems are sending events. Kerberos though
is supposed to help ensure that you have even more trust.
-Steve
> On a related note, using krb5 causes a problem with selinux. Unless I
> disable it (or figure out a rule) auditd fails to start because it is
> denied permission to create /var/tmp/auditd_0 kerberos replay cache file.
> Is there a rule or procedure to properly fix that?
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-23 15:21 krb5 issues Ken Bass
2016-05-24 14:07 ` Ken Bass
2016-05-26 15:16 ` Ken Bass
2016-05-26 20:04 ` Steve Grubb
2016-05-26 20:12 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4966724.aFqryVVfLb@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.