Re: Funny: git -p submodule summary

[Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>]

Jeff King schrieb:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> 
>>> Below is a patch that uses the three-process mechanism, and it fixes the
>>> problem. _But_ it is not satisfactory for inclusion, because it won't
>>> work on MINGW32. Since it is actually splitting git into two processes
>>> (one to monitor the pager and one to actually run git), it uses fork.
>> We have start_async()/finish_async() to replace a fork() of the sort that
>> we have here.
> 
> It looks like start_async is implemented using threads on Windows. Will
> that survive an execvp call? Because we don't know at this point whether
> we are going to actually run builtin code, or if we will exec an
> external.

Ah, no, it would not survive.

But there's a more serious problem why we cannot use start_async() in its
current form: It expects that there is a *function* that produces the
output; but here we don't have a function - output is produced by
*returning* (from setup_pager).

I'll test your other patch (that replaces the execvp in git.c by run_command).

-- Hannes