All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: mmotm 2011-04-29 - wonky VmRSS and VmHWM values after swapping
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 20:26:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49683.1304296014@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:26:16 PDT." <201104300002.p3U02Ma2026266@imap1.linux-foundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5460 bytes --]

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:26:16 PDT, akpm@linux-foundation.org said:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2011-04-29-16-25 has been uploaded to
> 
>    http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
 
Dell Latitude E6500 laptop, Core2 Due P8700, 4G RAM, 2G swap.Z86_64 kernel.

I was running a backup of the system to an external USB hard drive.  Source and
target filesystems were ext4 on LVM on a LUKS encrypted partition.  Same backup
script to same destination drive worked fine a few days ago on a -rc1-mmotm0331
kernel.

System ran out of RAM, and went about 50M into the 2G of swap. Not sure why *that*
happened, as previously the backup script didn't cause any swapping.  After that, the
VmRSS and VmHWM values were corrupted for some 20 processes, including systemd,
the X server, pidgin, firefox, rsyslogd

Nothing notable in dmesg output, Nothing noted by abrtd, no processes crashed
or misbehaving that I can tell.  Just wonky numbers.

top says:

Tasks: 186 total,   3 running, 183 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  9.1%us,  9.1%sy,  0.0%ni, 74.8%id,  6.7%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.2%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   4028664k total,  3839128k used,   189536k free,  1728880k buffers
Swap:  2097148k total,    52492k used,  2044656k free,  1081528k cached

   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND          
 47720 root      20   0     0    0    0 R 17.6  0.0   0:21.64 kworker/0:0       
 47453 root      20   0     0    0    0 D 13.7  0.0   0:36.10 kworker/1:3       
 26854 root      20   0     0    0    0 R  3.9  0.0   1:02.24 usb-storage       
 46917 root      20   0 18192    ?  208 D  3.9 457887369396224.0   4:18.50 dump 
 46918 root      20   0 18192    ?  208 S  3.9 457887369396224.0   4:18.38 dump 
 46919 root      20   0 18192    ?  208 D  3.9 457887369396224.0   4:18.48 dump 
     3 root      20   0     0    0    0 S  2.0  0.0   0:29.20 ksoftirqd/0       
    13 root      20   0     0    0    0 S  2.0  0.0   0:29.13 ksoftirqd/1       
  5467 root      20   0 12848  448  168 S  2.0  0.0  30:59.25 eTSrv             
  5655 root      20   0  178m    ?    ? S  2.0 457887369396224.0  89:18.03 Xorg 
  6079 valdis    20   0  347m 3936 5440 S  2.0  0.1  31:17.23 gkrellm           
  6479 valdis    20   0 1251m    ?    ? S  2.0 457887369396224.0  46:33.43 firef
 46916 root      20   0 22296 2708  328 S  2.0  0.1   0:39.38 dump              
 48406 root      20   0     0    0    0 S  2.0  0.0   0:00.06 kworker/1:1       
     1 root      20   0 72228    ?  924 S  0.0 457887369396224.0   0:06.69 syste

grep ^Vm /proc/5655/status (the X server)

VmPeak:   215788 kB
VmSize:   182440 kB
VmLck:         0 kB
VmHWM:  18446744073709544032 kB
VmRSS:  18446744073408330104 kB
VmData:    67688 kB
VmStk:       288 kB
VmExe:      1824 kB
VmLib:     37800 kB
VmPTE:       308 kB
VmSwap:        0 kB

Probably noteworth - the HWM in hex is FFFFFFFFFFFFE260,  and
similarly for VmRSS.  Looks like an underflow someplace?

It ended up hitting a bunch of processes:

grep 184467 /proc/*/status
/proc/1/status:VmHWM:   18446744073709551612 kB
/proc/1/status:VmRSS:   18446744073709550072 kB
/proc/26902/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709548820 kB
/proc/26902/status:VmRSS:       18446744073709547948 kB
/proc/27079/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709546764 kB
/proc/27079/status:VmRSS:       18446744073709382820 kB
/proc/28359/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709550700 kB
/proc/28359/status:VmRSS:       18446744073709510496 kB
/proc/42136/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709550528 kB
/proc/42136/status:VmRSS:       18446744073709549656 kB
/proc/46917/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709551568 kB
/proc/46917/status:VmRSS:       18446744073640042856 kB
/proc/46918/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709551568 kB
/proc/46918/status:VmRSS:       18446744073640042056 kB
/proc/46919/status:VmHWM:       18446744073709551568 kB
/proc/46919/status:VmRSS:       18446744073640037512 kB
/proc/4742/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709550144 kB
/proc/4742/status:VmRSS:        18446744073709549520 kB
/proc/4821/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709519576 kB
/proc/4821/status:VmRSS:        18446744073709519428 kB
/proc/5412/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709547064 kB
/proc/5412/status:VmRSS:        18446744073709546976 kB
/proc/5641/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709027168 kB
/proc/5641/status:VmRSS:        18446744073708532364 kB
/proc/5655/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709544032 kB
/proc/5655/status:VmRSS:        18446744073407790088 kB
/proc/5856/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709550760 kB
/proc/5856/status:VmRSS:        18446744073708844568 kB
/proc/5997/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709308884 kB
/proc/5997/status:VmRSS:        18446744073411781076 kB
/proc/6306/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709546960 kB
/proc/6306/status:VmRSS:        18446744073709425144 kB
/proc/6416/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709532884 kB
/proc/6416/status:VmRSS:        18446744073706032272 kB
/proc/6446/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709534900 kB
/proc/6446/status:VmRSS:        18446744073709527604 kB
/proc/6479/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709547196 kB
/proc/6479/status:VmRSS:        18446744073654889656 kB
/proc/6555/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709551612 kB
/proc/6555/status:VmRSS:        18446744073709526840 kB
/proc/6647/status:VmHWM:        18446744073709549680 kB
/proc/6647/status:VmRSS:        18446744073685279348 kB

Any ideas?  The backup has finished, but the corrupted values are hanging around.
Not sure if it's repeatable.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-29 23:26 mmotm 2011-04-29-16-25 uploaded akpm
2011-04-29 23:26 ` akpm
2011-04-30 16:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-04-30 16:46   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-05-01  7:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-01  7:47     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 15:46     ` Randy Dunlap
2011-05-02 15:46       ` Randy Dunlap
2011-05-01  2:35 ` [PATCH] mmotm: fix hang at startup Hugh Dickins
2011-05-01  2:35   ` Hugh Dickins
2011-05-01  3:25   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-01  3:25     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-02  0:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-05-02 14:37   ` mmotm 2011-04-29 - wonky VmRSS and VmHWM values after swapping Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-02 23:44     ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-02 23:44       ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-02 23:57       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-10 16:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-10 16:04         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-11 22:53         ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-11 22:53           ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-12  1:08         ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49683.1304296014@localhost \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.