From: "Marc - A. Dahlhaus" <mad@wol.de>
To: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xen with dom0 pvops on ultra-recent "git tip" kernel on x86_64
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496907CB.40005@wol.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231619339.5616.15.camel@leto.intern.saout.de>
Christophe Saout schrieb:
> Hi Marc,
>
>
>>> I am very excited to see that dom0 pvops is finally coming close to
>>> working, so I wanted to give it a try.
>>>
>>> >From the description it was not clear to me which kernel to chose as
>>> base for the patches.hg, so I took the latest (that was ~ 2 weeks ago)
>>> kernel on git.kernel.org I could find (post-2.6.28 git tip at that
>>> point).
>>>
>>>
>> Just follow the instructions on this wiki page:
>>
>> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
>>
>> You could also search the Archives of xen-devel beginning around
>> November 2008 for more
>> informations...
>>
>
> Yes, I followed those instruction (or at least I believe I did). It is
> however not specific as to which kernel version from the "tip.git" to
> use as base for applying the patches. I mean, that is not really my
> problem, I got everything applied and have a compiling kernel. It just
> doesn't boot (or at least doesn't get as far as for instance Pasi and
> his experiments).
>
hg update `cat patches/KERNEL_VERSION`
this line selects the right version to apply the patches...
> Actually, I am not really interested in getting a working kernel (I know
> that there are still some pieces missing), so this is purely academical
> and for testing. Since the patches are supposed to be merged soon (at
> least I got the impression that was the plan) I though I was going to
> join the testing effort. And at this point they are supposed to sort of
> work on any bleeding edge kernel, right? So I took one.
>
> I could have gone back in the history and take something around
> 2.6.28-rc8 (which seemed to have worked for others), but then they were
> using x86_32 and I am testing x86_64, if I see correctly. So my
> question was mostly if this had seen some testing at all, is supposed to
> work, and if it is, did I miss something. In any case, this is the
> result of my testing. :-)
>
> I also forward-ported a few things to the latest version a few hours
> ago, including some changes in xen-iommu.c to follow the dma_ops merging
> thing in the tip head.
>
> I managed to get the native XEN port for 2.6.27 from the other hg
> booting on my notebook, I'll try to see if my pvops kernel works as
> DomU.
>
> Cheers,
> Christophe
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-10 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 19:22 Xen with dom0 pvops on ultra-recent "git tip" kernel on x86_64 Christophe Saout
2009-01-10 20:11 ` Marc - A. Dahlhaus
2009-01-10 20:28 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-10 20:37 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-01-10 20:49 ` Marc - A. Dahlhaus
2009-01-10 20:54 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-10 21:13 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-11 14:17 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-11 14:52 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-11 16:35 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-11 16:59 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-11 20:13 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-12 14:17 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-12 16:41 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-13 9:28 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-13 15:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-01-13 16:41 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-13 16:57 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-16 17:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-01-16 17:40 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-16 17:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-01-17 16:29 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-18 20:10 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-18 21:28 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-18 22:39 ` Xen with dom0 pvops on ultra-recent "git tip"kernel " Keir Fraser
2009-01-19 9:52 ` Christophe Saout
2009-01-19 12:33 ` Christophe Saout
2009-02-22 23:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-24 9:32 ` Christophe Saout
2009-02-24 10:41 ` Christophe Saout
2009-02-24 16:20 ` Boris Derzhavets
2009-02-24 21:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-24 21:51 ` Andrew Lyon
2009-02-25 7:16 ` Boris Derzhavets
2009-04-23 21:49 ` Nvidia drivers on " Nigel Gamble
2009-04-24 7:43 ` Andrew Lyon
[not found] ` <1240816930.4387.18.camel@petrie>
2009-04-28 0:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-28 5:33 ` William Pitcock
2009-04-29 15:13 ` Attempt to load the most recent 2.6.30-rc-tip under Xen-3.3.1 on F11-preview Boris Derzhavets
2009-04-29 15:58 ` Boris Derzhavets
2009-04-29 16:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-29 18:42 ` Boris Derzhavets
2009-02-25 6:39 ` Xen with dom0 pvops on ultra-recent "git tip"kernel on x86_64 Boris Derzhavets
2009-01-20 20:08 ` Xen with dom0 pvops on ultra-recent "git tip" kernel " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-01-20 21:27 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-01-21 18:32 ` Andrew Lyon
2009-01-26 19:56 ` Adam Wendt
2009-01-13 18:16 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-01-16 17:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-01-16 18:22 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-01-10 20:40 ` Marc - A. Dahlhaus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496907CB.40005@wol.de \
--to=mad@wol.de \
--cc=christophe@saout.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.