From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: git-patches list? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <496C502A.3070908@op5.se> References: <90bb445a0901121543q29d30d49yaa723b4b913a4b31@mail.gmail.com> <7vr638f5ch.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Akira Kitada , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 13 09:27:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LMecv-0008MH-Pr for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755913AbZAMI0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:26:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755655AbZAMI0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:26:23 -0500 Received: from mail.op5.se ([193.201.96.20]:51355 "EHLO mail.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753754AbZAMI0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:26:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2D11B81863; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.op5.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.op5.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLtZBzQDMR9q; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from clix.int.op5.se (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5471B81512; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:17 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <7vr638f5ch.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Akira Kitada writes: > >> Can I propose having another mailing list for posting patches to avoid >> daily mail flood to this list? >> >> Yes, I can filter out the emails but still... > > This list has always been the only place where git development happens. > It would make the development very awkward to set up another list only for > patches, forbid patches to be sent to anywhere but that new list, but > still discuss the patches on this list. > > It does not make much sense to me. > I agree. If any new list is to be introduced, it would only make sense to make it a read-only "what's new" list, for the various people that want to know what might break/be fixed in new versions but really don't care about the discussion that lead to that decision. Is that what you were after, Akira? -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231