From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
rjones@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Machine-readable or parseable qemu output
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:28:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496DCC68.4000509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090114111005.GB31839@amit-x200.pnq.redhat.com>
Amit Shah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Continuing from the thread at [1], building on Daniel's suggestions, I
> have jot down a few points as to how a libqemumonitor API could be
> developed.
>
> To recap, there has to be an interface to the qemu monitor in
> a way that wouldn't break even if the monitor output changes. This API
> will remain the same, so that consumers (libvirt, etc) can safely
> integrate with the monitor.
>
> Please see Dan's email at [1] to get the background details.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg14615.html
>
> Here are some initial thoughts. Comments?
>
> - Have a libqemumonitor.so that will abstract out output from qemu and
> provide a machine-readble output for the consumer
>
> - Registering with a particular qemu instance:
> - qemu_instance = attach_to_qemu("/path/to/socket");
>
qemu chrdev ("tcp:host:port", etc)
> - The strings in qemu monitor can change but the libqemumonitor has to
> change accordingly as well to keep the API consistent.
>
No, they can't. The monitor client and qemu will be upgraded independently.
> - The API could be something like:
> - execute_qemu_command(qemu_instance, command, args...);
>
>
It'd much prefer
qemu_hotplug_nic(...);
qemu_migrate(..., callback);
> - In addition to the return value seen of the loglevel type from the
> monitor, there can be additional return values that can be provided
> based on the command executed. This can be queried by:
> - get_info_on_prev_command(qemu_instance, &ret);
> - This can give command-specific return values, like success,
> invalid parameter, etc.
>
No, the command handler should parse the output expected from executing
the command. If the command is asynchronous, the command handler should
provide a callback.
> - The string generated by qemu monitor output should never be exposed to
> the consumer
>
Right.
> - Some monitor commands will generate some string that might be of use
> to the consumer. Such a string will be passed to the consumer via some
> other api, like
> - get_string_from_last_command(qemu_instance, some_context);
>
Output parameters will do fine.
> - There might be output that's asynchronous to the command. Finding the
> correlation between the command and the output should not be the
> library's job; an async_socket can be created per qemu instance and
> the consumer can select() on this socket to poll for data. Whenever
> some information becomes available, we can push it out. If the qemu
> output would contain more information for async output, this can be
> passed on to the consumer.
>
You're moving the protocol handling out from the protocol parser...
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 11:10 [Qemu-devel] Machine-readable or parseable qemu output Amit Shah
2009-01-14 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-15 20:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-15 20:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-15 21:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-15 21:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-15 22:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-14 11:28 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-01-15 20:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-14 11:29 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-01-14 11:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-14 11:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-01-14 11:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-14 12:37 ` Dor Laor
2009-01-14 14:05 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-15 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-14 16:56 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496DCC68.4000509@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.