Re: RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Modification of credit scheduler rev2

[NISHIGUCHI Naoki <nisiguti@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Su, Disheng wrote:
> NISHIGUCHI Naoki wrote:
>>> 		c. the limitation of weight for guest B. I have to set the weight
>>> of guest B to 10. It may not be reasonable in real usage case. 
>> Is copying large files in background on guest A indispensable?
>> In my test, guest A runs only video playing.
>> I think that my approach couldn't solve this issue.
> 
> You know, guest A is the primary guest to end user, so we can't make any assumption about the user's operation in guest A, which is the big challenge for client virtualization IMO.
> Weight, Cap, Boost credit, are all can be used together, or adding new mechanism, such as static priority as Kevin said, to solve the problem.

I see.
That is really the big challenge.
I think we should experiment in various configuration and clarify some 
problems.

>>> 	Do you have the experience with audio? I don't know I have properly
>>> configured your scheduler or not. Hope the your scheduler can solve
>>> the audio issues also.  
>> Sorry, I don't have the experience with audio.
>> But I'll try to reproduce your configuration and investigate.
>>
> 
> Glad to see you have interest with audio also. Any problem when you reproduce the audio issues, pls let me know.

Thanks.

Regards,
Naoki