From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ioemu: don't use magic number 0xff00000. Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:48:38 +0000 Message-ID: <496F30A6.8090507@eu.citrix.com> References: <20090115122259.GX1565%yamahata@valinux.co.jp> <20090115124448.GJ16629@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090115124448.GJ16629@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Samuel Thibault , Isaku Yamahata , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ah, so Stefano's patch actually got applied?? I thought Keir preferred > to stay with allocating video memory from hvmloader. > > Note that I do not really care about which way we go, what's important > to keep in mind is that if we revert to qemu populating the video > memory, stubdom-based qemu can _not_ work with the default Xen > parameters, because of memory ballooning. > I am working on xend balloning to make it work safely with stubdoms.