From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] trace_workqueue: use percpu data for workqueue stat
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49704619.4030806@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c62985530901150509we244b70l4e7af5c6b6145f30@mail.gmail.com>
Impact: use percpu data instead hardcode
Use
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct workqueue_global_stats, all_workqueue_stat);
instead of allocate it.
And percpu data works well on NUMA.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
index f8118d3..4664990 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <trace/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include "trace_stat.h"
#include "trace.h"
@@ -37,7 +38,8 @@ struct workqueue_global_stats {
/* Don't need a global lock because allocated before the workqueues, and
* never freed.
*/
-static struct workqueue_global_stats *all_workqueue_stat;
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct workqueue_global_stats, all_workqueue_stat);
+#define workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu) (&per_cpu(all_workqueue_stat, cpu))
/* Insertion of a work */
static void
@@ -48,8 +50,8 @@ probe_workqueue_insertion(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list,
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
atomic_inc(&node->inserted);
@@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ probe_workqueue_insertion(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
}
pr_debug("trace_workqueue: entry not found\n");
found:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
}
/* Execution of a work */
@@ -70,8 +72,8 @@ probe_workqueue_execution(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list,
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
node->executed++;
@@ -80,7 +82,7 @@ probe_workqueue_execution(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
}
pr_debug("trace_workqueue: entry not found\n");
found:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
}
/* Creation of a cpu workqueue thread */
@@ -104,11 +106,11 @@ static void probe_workqueue_creation(struct task_struct *wq_thread, int cpu)
cws->pid = wq_thread->pid;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
- if (list_empty(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list))
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
+ if (list_empty(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list))
cws->first_entry = true;
- list_add_tail(&cws->list, &all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ list_add_tail(&cws->list, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
}
/* Destruction of a cpu workqueue thread */
@@ -119,8 +121,8 @@ static void probe_workqueue_destruction(struct task_struct *wq_thread)
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list,
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
list_del(&node->list);
@@ -131,7 +133,7 @@ static void probe_workqueue_destruction(struct task_struct *wq_thread)
pr_debug("trace_workqueue: don't find workqueue to destroy\n");
found:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
}
@@ -141,13 +143,13 @@ static struct cpu_workqueue_stats *workqueue_stat_start_cpu(int cpu)
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *ret = NULL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
- if (!list_empty(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list))
- ret = list_entry(all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list.next,
+ if (!list_empty(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list))
+ ret = list_entry(workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next,
struct cpu_workqueue_stats, list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -172,9 +174,9 @@ static void *workqueue_stat_next(void *prev, int idx)
unsigned long flags;
void *ret = NULL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
- if (list_is_last(&prev_cws->list, &all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
+ if (list_is_last(&prev_cws->list, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
for (++cpu ; cpu < num_possible_cpus(); cpu++) {
ret = workqueue_stat_start_cpu(cpu);
if (ret)
@@ -182,7 +184,7 @@ static void *workqueue_stat_next(void *prev, int idx)
}
return NULL;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
return list_entry(prev_cws->list.next, struct cpu_workqueue_stats,
list);
@@ -199,10 +201,10 @@ static int workqueue_stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
cws->executed,
trace_find_cmdline(cws->pid));
- spin_lock_irqsave(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
- if (&cws->list == all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list.next)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
+ if (&cws->list == workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next)
seq_printf(s, "\n");
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -258,17 +260,9 @@ int __init trace_workqueue_early_init(void)
if (ret)
goto no_creation;
- all_workqueue_stat = kmalloc(sizeof(struct workqueue_global_stats)
- * num_possible_cpus(), GFP_KERNEL);
-
- if (!all_workqueue_stat) {
- pr_warning("trace_workqueue: not enough memory\n");
- goto no_creation;
- }
-
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- spin_lock_init(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&all_workqueue_stat[cpu].list);
+ spin_lock_init(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list);
}
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-15 12:01 [PATCH -tip] trace_workqueue: use percpu data for workqueue stat Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-15 13:09 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-16 8:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-16 8:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-16 8:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-16 8:32 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2009-01-16 9:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49704619.4030806@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.