From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28]:40039 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760093AbZAPRSo (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:18:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4970C16E.6030107@gmail.com> (sfid-20090116_181850_979948_FBECB5AF) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:18:38 -0800 From: "Justin P. Mattock" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Moore CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, SE-Linux Subject: Re: netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic References: <496D759A.7010401@gmail.com> <200901151752.06622.paul.moore@hp.com> <200901161109.27222.paul.moore@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200901161109.27222.paul.moore@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday 15 January 2009 7:44:15 pm Justin Mattock wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> >>> Well, it is possible that /bin/sh points to a non-bash shell but >>> maybe not (I'm pretty sure the make command executes the scripts >>> with /bin/sh). Either way, I checked in the fix to the SVN tree >>> earlier today so newer releases will have the fix; if needed I can >>> release a 0.19.1 or similar but I want to wait and see how >>> widespread the problem is ... >>> >>> -- >>> paul moore >>> linux @ hp >>> >> Cool, If I see anybody >> struggling, I point them to the >> fix you posted. >> > > Great. Also let me know, if this looks like it will be widespread > problem I'll make a new release; I'd hate for people to have to patch > the Makefile to get it to build ... > > no problem. >> I also might be missing something, i.g. >> one of the boxes that gave this error I built >> with debootstrap, but then the other that gave this as well >> was built with nubuntu which seems more complete >> than debootstrap. >> but then maybe both are missing a package. >> (or it's a debian thing) >> > > It could also be my rather poor understanding of bash and makefiles :) > If anyone out there wants to take a look and offer an explanation or a > better patch I'm more than happy to accept it. > > here as well. regards; Justin P. Mattock From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0GHIiT1008164 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:18:44 -0500 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n0GHIgN9021296 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:18:43 GMT Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so701618ywa.84 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:18:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4970C16E.6030107@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:18:38 -0800 From: "Justin P. Mattock" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Moore CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, SE-Linux Subject: Re: netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic References: <496D759A.7010401@gmail.com> <200901151752.06622.paul.moore@hp.com> <200901161109.27222.paul.moore@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200901161109.27222.paul.moore@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday 15 January 2009 7:44:15 pm Justin Mattock wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> >>> Well, it is possible that /bin/sh points to a non-bash shell but >>> maybe not (I'm pretty sure the make command executes the scripts >>> with /bin/sh). Either way, I checked in the fix to the SVN tree >>> earlier today so newer releases will have the fix; if needed I can >>> release a 0.19.1 or similar but I want to wait and see how >>> widespread the problem is ... >>> >>> -- >>> paul moore >>> linux @ hp >>> >> Cool, If I see anybody >> struggling, I point them to the >> fix you posted. >> > > Great. Also let me know, if this looks like it will be widespread > problem I'll make a new release; I'd hate for people to have to patch > the Makefile to get it to build ... > > no problem. >> I also might be missing something, i.g. >> one of the boxes that gave this error I built >> with debootstrap, but then the other that gave this as well >> was built with nubuntu which seems more complete >> than debootstrap. >> but then maybe both are missing a package. >> (or it's a debian thing) >> > > It could also be my rather poor understanding of bash and makefiles :) > If anyone out there wants to take a look and offer an explanation or a > better patch I'm more than happy to accept it. > > here as well. regards; Justin P. Mattock -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.