Re: netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>]

Eric Paris wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 12:24:41 pm Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 12:05 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>>>       
>
>   
>>>> It's pretty cool.  In newer versions of netlabelctl I added an
>>>> undocumented option to actually allow it to fix a sandwhich and do
>>>> the dishes afterwards.  The exact command line option needed is
>>>> left as an exercise for the reader :)
>>>>         
>>> I hope it doesn't run afoul of this patent:
>>> http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=US2005044838&WO=2006068865&DIS
>>> PLAY=STATUS
>>>       
>> Sigh.  I fear that it may, guess I'll have to pull feature from the next
>> release :(  What am I going to do for lunch now!
>>     
>
> "pre-assembly of various sandwich components and simultaneous
> preparation of different parts of the same sandwich"
>
> Unless netlabelctl is mutl-threaded I think you're safe based on the
> "simultaneous preparation" portion of the patent.  I'm glad you've
> done this.  I'm hungry, even if I have to wait for one part of the
> sandwich to be finished before it starts working on the next....
>
> -Eric
>
>   
hot deal 2 big mac's for $3.50
this way while you're having one, the other
is being assembled.(but there's competition;
2 famous star's for $3.00);

regards;

Justin P. Mattock

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.