From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: nsgroup autoremoving
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:35:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973A0AD.6090508@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090116165217.GA8477-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While trying to unshare a namespace with the clone syscall with an
>> inifinite loop, I got an EEXIST.
>> That looks weird to have such syscall returning EEXIST ... :)
>>
>> After investigating, it appears the ns_cgroup creates automatically a
>> control group named with the pid number when we call the clone syscall
>> with a namespace parameter and when the namespace exits, the control
>> group is not automatically removed. So when the pid numbers are recycled
>> we conflict with a previous ns_cgroup name and the clone fails.
>>
>> IMHO, if the nsgroup is automatically created, it should automatically
>> destroyed, otherwise what will happen to application using the
>> namespaces (eg. mount namespace) wrote before nsgroup appeared ?
>>
>
> but you can have it automatically destroyed. I.e. I did the
> following:
>
> mount -t cgroup -o freezer,ns freezer /cgroup
> cat > /bin/release_cgroup.sh << EOF
> #!/bin/sh
> echo "Removing dead cgroup .$*." >> /var/log/cgroup
> rmdir /cgroup/$* >> /var/log/cgroup 2>&1
> echo "return value was $?" >> /var/log/cgroup
> EOF
> echo /bin/release_cgroup.sh > /cgroup/release_agent
> echo 1 > /cgroup/notify_on_release
> chmod ugo+x /bin/release_cgroup.sh
> ns_exec -m /bin/sh
> ls /cgroup`
> 3581 notify_on_release release_agent tasks
> exit
> ls /cgroup
> notify_on_release release_agent tasks
>
Assuming you mount with all the subsystems, this script will destroy the
non-nsgroup too. Each time I create a control group manually, I have to
unset the notify_on_release, right ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-18 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 10:23 nsgroup autoremoving Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <49706006.80002-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-16 16:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090116165217.GA8477-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-18 21:35 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
[not found] ` <4973A0AD.6090508-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-18 23:32 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090118233216.GA10126-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-19 3:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4973A0AD.6090508@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano-ganu6spqydw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.